July 31, 2010 / Exclusive: Conservative Snobbery?

Facebook Twitter RSS ScoopDaily Email Alerts / Want to write for Scoop? Apply Now

Worth Reading by Graison Hensley-Chapman

About the Author

Graison Hensley-Chapman

(Editor, Scoop Wire) covers how politics and policy affect the generation coming of age in the Obama era. He lives in Chicago, Illinois.

Graison's Favorite Posts

This user has not marked any posts as favorite posts yet.

Maybe Not Tomorrow, But..

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print

Via Greg Sargent, Ezra Klein highlights a bit of polling on Medicare right after it passed:

After Lyndon Johnson was elected, a Harris poll found only a minority, 46%, supported a Federal plan to extend health care to the aged. Today, of course, Medicare is overwhelmingly popular.

What matters less, I think, is when that 46% grew to the vastly larger amount of support the program enjoys 55 years later, when it paid off politically. And the fact is you cannot know when it will (could anyone have predicted the political circumstances that would allow the party opposing universal healthcare to invoke Medicare?) What matters is that the reforming party ruled by conviction despite the polling. As Sargent noted, the health agenda of Johnson’s predecessor was shot down, and opinion held the proposal in low regard (sound familiar?). But leadership drove it through anyway, and their party still reaps the benefit of being favored by the public on economic and domestic issues.

What that means for Democrats, then, is if you hold Democratic values, passing the bill is the right thing to do and ultimately the best thing to do. Because the political climate tomorrow is uncertain anyway, because the long-term outlook favors reformers, and because hell, if you’re won’t do what you were elected to do, there’s no sense in electing you anyway.

Popularity: 4% [?]

Would you like to join in the discussion?Comments

Have something to add?

Worth Reading