The world’s greatest fears have officially been confirmed. Former Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin has announced she will resign from her post as Alaska’s governor to “[take] my fight for what’s right in a new direction.”
Yes, that’s right folks. The self-proclaimed Alaskan pitbull will likely bring her hockey mom politics and foreign policy smarts straight to Washington, poised to condemn anyone who stands in the way of her Presidency or uses her daughters’ name in a comedy sketch on a late-night talk show.
I have to say I’m impressed. I never thought the day would come that I would actually prefer fake-tan Mitt Romney to someone who is basically a pair of talking stillettos. Then again, never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined that the Republican party would devolve into a semi-McCarthyist machine bent on derailing every Democratic measure put forth in an economic crisis.
Yes… these are strange times indeed.
Here are 10 reasons all of us should run for the hills, screaming, if Sarah Palin runs/wins in 2012.
1) Folksiness can’t replace real foreign policy credentials. I wonder if she even knows the Soviet Union was dismantled.
2) Rumored abuse of executive power regarding her attempts to get her ex-brother-in-law fired from his job as state trooper. Can we really trust her not to pursue personal agendas or vendettas in an office as important as the Presidency? Isn’t that a little too Nixon?
3) From 1996 to 2002, Mayor Palin (of Wasilla) raised sales taxes to pay for the construction of a sports complex built on someone else’s land. She then invoked “Eminent domain” to sue Gary Lundgren, a developer who held title to the land. Lundgren eventually won in court and received a $1.7 million settlement from the city. Quite a price for such an amateur mistake!
4) Time Magazine reported that Sarah Palin “asked the library how she could go about banning books” like Harry Potter because of “inappropriate” language. When the librarian, Mary Ellen Baker, did not give her “full support”, Palin threatened to fire her. What is this, 1984? We are practically inviting moonbat accusations of a “fascist America” and falsely vindicating their belief that the Republican party is made up of censor-happy tyrants.
5) She still holds the misinformed view that creationism qualifies as a scientific theory. This is incorrect. While it is a perfectly acceptable view for the religious, and should be respected even by those who do not believe in it, “creationism” doesn’t fill the criteria to be a “scientific theory.” Scientific theories like evolution have been tested by experimental means over a long period of time and are able to consistently explain many sets of scientific phenomena. But because creationism cannot be verified by any sort of scientific experimentation, it fulfills none of the criteria to qualify as a scientific theory. Beliefs that don’t qualify as scientific theories have no place in science classrooms.
6) She is an unbelievably polarizing figure and a terrible example of Republicanism. Do we really need to add to our bad rap?
7) The Katie Couric interview isn’t an anomaly. Her answers weren’t off, they were just WRONG. In an economic crisis that likely won’t pass within the next three years, we cannot possibly elect a politician that thinks a bailout will “help those who are concerned about health care reform.”
8 ) She’s an international punch line. We would effectively destroy all progress POTUS 44 has made abroad by expanding American rhetoric, extending a hand to the Muslim world and repairing relations with wary Europeans still haunted by memories of George Bush Jr. We don’t need yet another reason for Europeans to turn up their noses at the mere mention of the American people — God knows we’ve been through enough of that nonsense already.
9) Sen. John McCain can’t even “politely lie” about supporting his former Vice Presidential candidate. When asked whether he would support a Palin-Anyone ticket on Meet the Press, McCain mumbled something about “a lot” of other good candidates planning to run in 2012 and basically just blabbered his way out of an official answer.
10) She’d probably choose Joe the Plumber to be VP. Yeah, THE Joe Plumber. They’d probably crack open a six-pack in the Oval Office and drunk-text Putin or something. This world has gone to the dogs.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Would you like to join in the discussion? Comments
Alexander Herren, A prime example of “Education Level and the gift of Gab does not equal intelligence” If you could remove your and your Master Obama's brain and drop them in a puddle of water, It would be like Pelosi,Reids and Dodds combined . They wouldn't even make a splash. Your comment on Cspan on 5 July. You spoke of Your masters Porkulus plan and how great it was and in the next breath spoke of the next “stimulus”.
July 5, 2009 at 6:11 amOK you're a Democrat so I'll point out the question. If the Porkulus is working so well Why do we need another and No it's not GWB's fault. By the way the reason people sent Obama their money. It was probably because they figured 5 – 30.00 $ was a good investment for someone who wants to only “ride the train” not help “move the train” . He'll pay my mortage and fill my tank with gas. Remember that? Young Naive and a feeling of entitlement? No-one owes You or Obama or the rest of the freeloaders who want a free ride.
On her worst day Sarah Palin is a better solution than a bunch of freeloading welfare wannabe's such as yourself and the rest of the 56 million idiots who think Obama gives a rats butt about them.
To whomever was stupid enough to write the Palin article , You helped elect Obama oa a political correctness platform. He has and still has NO Foreign Policy Experience except for his Apology for being an American tour. It's okay to look at all sides and draw conclusions but if you're listening to the Clinton News Network Or ABC whos evidently in love with Obama. You're probably not being very objective. Now run along and kiss Master Obama's Butt
July 5, 2009 at 6:16 amYOur'e grammar., capitalizationS; and Punctuation,,, suck.
Also, it's Alexander Heffner.
July 5, 2009 at 1:27 pmSonia; I couldn't agree with you more. As a woman, Palin is an embarrassment to women!
July 6, 2009 at 4:01 amDarn though,…… If she doesn't run….. I guess their won't be any new material for Tina Fey…. Darn! lol.
And by the way, Obama Rocks!
Although I am not personally a fan of Sarah Palin, I want to make it clear that several claims made within this article are downright ridiculous:
1) Sarah Palin DOES have foreign policy credentials (she signed a long overdue pipeline agreement with Canada and served as Commander of the Alaskan NG).
2) Palin did not abuse her office by sacking that troop commander. An inquiry has exonerated her.
3) So far, Barack Obama has accomplished NOTHING GOOD in the foreign policy arena, and is unlikely to achieve anything. American rhetoric matters little, and he has damaged, not repaired, America's relations with Europe. Claiming that the Europeans were “weary” of President Bush is also a blatant lie. Here's the record of the Bush Admin on foreign policy:
a) The Bush Admin accepted (in 2008) France's conditions of return to NATO, and welcomed it back to NATO.
b) On President Bush's watch, Sarkozy and Merkel replaced Chirac and Schroeder.
c) President Bush expanded NATO and concluded a missile shield agreement with Poland and the Czech Rep.
d) President Bush improved America's relations with China by opening a new embassy in Beijing, attending the Beijing Olympics, and condemnding Taiwan's provocative policies and siding with China on the issue of Taiwan.
e) President Bush formed crucial partnerships with Latin American countries, e.g. Colombia, signed an FTA with that country and with Peru, and proposed a Free Trade Area of the Americas.
f) President Bush offered a special partnership to America's neighbors Canada and Mexico; this partnership, the SPP, was officially created in 2005.
g) President Bush liberated two countries and 50 million people from oppressive dictatorships, killed or captured Hussein's clique, killed many terrorist leaders and drove the rest into Afghan caves. He did all of this while NOT ALLOWING another terrorist attack at home. In Afghanistan's case, NATO deployed its forces to that country, the first time NATO deployed its troops beyond Europe.
h) President Bush formed a decent partnership with Pakistan while also improving America's previously-strained relations with India.
In other words, you guys don't know what you're talking about.
July 6, 2009 at 7:41 amI came across an online community for individual seeking interracial love. It is ^***B l a c k- W h i t e- L o v i n g – c O m***^^^^All singles there are seeking interracial relationships. Interracial is not a problem there, but a great merit to cherish!
July 19, 2009 at 6:21 amHave something to add?