<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Townhall Meets Oval Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoopdaily.com/2009/03/26/when-townhall-meets-oval-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoopdaily.com/2009/03/26/when-townhall-meets-oval-office/</link>
	<description>Fresh Lens on the 44th President</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:23:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Traveller_Adventure</title>
		<link>http://www.scoopdaily.com/2009/03/26/when-townhall-meets-oval-office/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Traveller_Adventure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoop44.com/?p=2824#comment-404</guid>
		<description>This is quite impressive, I am pleased to read this post, keep posts like this coming, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;you totally rock!&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://the-review.info/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blog Review&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite impressive, I am pleased to read this post, keep posts like this coming, </p>
<p>you totally rock!<br />Cheers,<br /><a href="http://the-review.info/" rel="nofollow">Blog Review</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outsourcing Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.scoopdaily.com/2009/03/26/when-townhall-meets-oval-office/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Outsourcing Copenhagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoop44.com/?p=2824#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Obama is so great on it&#039;s first 100 days on white house</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is so great on it&#39;s first 100 days on white house</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SunflowerPipes</title>
		<link>http://www.scoopdaily.com/2009/03/26/when-townhall-meets-oval-office/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>SunflowerPipes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoop44.com/?p=2824#comment-402</guid>
		<description>I respect Obama he is a talented politician, President Obama seems to posse’s insightful, reasonable judgment on many issues, although in the case of marijuana prohibition laws I find Obama’s choice to answer with mocking humor to be lacking.  Smoking marijuana is an easy thing to laugh about, it seems there is something about being stoned that brings a smile to people’s faces, however marijuana prohibition is not a joke. We should not be making jokes as millions of Americans are arrested for being caught on the wrong side of moral politicking, we should not laugh as we spend over 30 billion dollars a year going after Americans for smoking weed, we should not giggle and poke fun as we watch billions of dollars in tax revenue slip through our fingers each year, and should we not be jolly as thousands of people are murdered by cartels profiting from America’s moral hypocrisy. I believe there are profound latent consequences in prohibition that are not even factored in to our assessments of the effects of illegality, such as how we view the rule of law and the role of law enforcement in the community, the divisiveness between users and non users, the stigma of mental shock of incarceration. I say pot prohibition is no joke it has real costs paid for in real lives.  Freedom is achieved in a country by placing responsibility in the hands of the citizen and not by the state legally enforcing morality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;www.sunflowerpipes.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SunflowerPipes.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respect Obama he is a talented politician, President Obama seems to posse’s insightful, reasonable judgment on many issues, although in the case of marijuana prohibition laws I find Obama’s choice to answer with mocking humor to be lacking.  Smoking marijuana is an easy thing to laugh about, it seems there is something about being stoned that brings a smile to people’s faces, however marijuana prohibition is not a joke. We should not be making jokes as millions of Americans are arrested for being caught on the wrong side of moral politicking, we should not laugh as we spend over 30 billion dollars a year going after Americans for smoking weed, we should not giggle and poke fun as we watch billions of dollars in tax revenue slip through our fingers each year, and should we not be jolly as thousands of people are murdered by cartels profiting from America’s moral hypocrisy. I believe there are profound latent consequences in prohibition that are not even factored in to our assessments of the effects of illegality, such as how we view the rule of law and the role of law enforcement in the community, the divisiveness between users and non users, the stigma of mental shock of incarceration. I say pot prohibition is no joke it has real costs paid for in real lives.  Freedom is achieved in a country by placing responsibility in the hands of the citizen and not by the state legally enforcing morality.<br /><a href="www.sunflowerpipes.com" rel="nofollow">SunflowerPipes.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datdamwuf</title>
		<link>http://www.scoopdaily.com/2009/03/26/when-townhall-meets-oval-office/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>datdamwuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoop44.com/?p=2824#comment-401</guid>
		<description>This is unfounded BS &quot;While the ability of an interest group to hijack the voting methodology shows one of the method’s downfalls&quot;. Obviously a majority wanted a serious answer the the question of legalization of marijuana. No one &quot;hijacked&quot; anything, the president chose to trivialize the question and that was unfortunate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is unfounded BS &#8220;While the ability of an interest group to hijack the voting methodology shows one of the method’s downfalls&#8221;. Obviously a majority wanted a serious answer the the question of legalization of marijuana. No one &#8220;hijacked&#8221; anything, the president chose to trivialize the question and that was unfortunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
